# Chosen Anderson — prediction record



## Is Chosen Anderson accurate?

Across 3 graded calls in 2 articles, Chosen Anderson scores 56.25% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 8.34, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims. That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

## Record

- **Accuracy:** 56.25%
- **MissedTakes Score:** 8.34
- **Graded articles:** 2
- **Graded individual calls:** 3
- **Clarity:** not enough data
- **Hedged:** not enough data
- **Right when hedging:** not enough data
- **Right when committing:** not enough data

PROVISIONAL: fewer than 10 graded articles. This number is not yet meaningful, and they are excluded from leaderboards.

The MissedTakes Score is how much better than a naive baseline they did, not how often they were right. Zero means no better than a strategy requiring no knowledge. A record is counted in ARTICLES rather than individual calls, because thirty picks in one mock draft is one act of judgment rather than thirty.

Full method: https://missedtakes.co/methodology

## Graded articles (2)

### Jun 26, 2025 — scored 100 across 1 call

Anderson said Washington could have the best offense in the NFL, and that Joe Flacco should and would be Cleveland's starter with the rookies sitting.

https://missedtakes.co/opinions/9cac29a0-9821-44fe-bc98-b3e64f9d6f0e

### Jun 26, 2025 — scored 12.5 across 2 calls

The free agent receiver picked the 49ers as their team in the NFC West, believing the division comes down to San Francisco and the Rams, said Jaxon Smith-Njigba will be a top-ten receiver this season, and agreed Stafford is a first-ballot Hall of Famer.

https://missedtakes.co/opinions/f8da875a-a5ef-42ee-872f-d3de0b5e2e10


---

We grade claims about outcomes, never claims about people. If something here is wrong, tell us:
https://missedtakes.co/corrections?pundit=chosen-anderson