# Michael Brockers — prediction record



## Is Michael Brockers accurate?

Across 6 graded calls in 1 article, Michael Brockers scores 66.67% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 66.67, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims. That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

## Record

- **Accuracy:** 66.67%
- **MissedTakes Score:** 66.67
- **Graded articles:** 1
- **Graded individual calls:** 6
- **Clarity:** 100%
- **Hedged:** 2.5% of claims
- **Right when hedging:** not enough data
- **Right when committing:** not enough data

PROVISIONAL: fewer than 10 graded articles. This number is not yet meaningful, and they are excluded from leaderboards.

The MissedTakes Score is how much better than a naive baseline they did, not how often they were right. Zero means no better than a strategy requiring no knowledge. A record is counted in ARTICLES rather than individual calls, because thirty picks in one mock draft is one act of judgment rather than thirty.

Full method: https://missedtakes.co/methodology

## Graded articles (1)

### May 19, 2026 — scored 66.67 across 6 calls

Brock picked the Rams to win nearly every game, with losses only to Buffalo, Washington, San Francisco in December and Seattle on Christmas, finishing 13-4 and winning the NFC West, and said Puka Nacua would top 1,709 receiving yards.

https://missedtakes.co/opinions/e7d13468-d30b-4b62-95a8-1fbd66171345


---

We grade claims about outcomes, never claims about people. If something here is wrong, tell us:
https://missedtakes.co/corrections?pundit=michael-brockers