# Plaxico Burress — prediction record



## Is Plaxico Burress accurate?

Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Plaxico Burress scores 77.11% accuracy. That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

## Record

- **Accuracy:** 77.11%
- **MissedTakes Score:** not enough data
- **Graded articles:** 1
- **Graded individual calls:** 1
- **Clarity:** not enough data
- **Hedged:** not enough data
- **Right when hedging:** not enough data
- **Right when committing:** not enough data

PROVISIONAL: fewer than 10 graded articles. This number is not yet meaningful, and they are excluded from leaderboards.

The MissedTakes Score is how much better than a naive baseline they did, not how often they were right. Zero means no better than a strategy requiring no knowledge. A record is counted in ARTICLES rather than individual calls, because thirty picks in one mock draft is one act of judgment rather than thirty.

Full method: https://missedtakes.co/methodology

## Graded articles (1)

### Feb 28, 2026 — scored 77.11 across 1 call

Burress said Oregon tight end Kenyon Sadik boosted their stock so much at the combine that they won't last to the 23rd pick, projecting them as a top-ten selection and saying they won't fall past 10 or 12. They also predicted Deshaun Watson will be Cleveland's opening day starting quarterback over Shedeur Sanders and Dillon Gabriel.

https://missedtakes.co/opinions/794b5f8e-a459-415d-9805-4eee455fc9c7


---

We grade claims about outcomes, never claims about people. If something here is wrong, tell us:
https://missedtakes.co/corrections?pundit=plaxico-burress