Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Locked On Chiefs (podcast)
Across 2 graded calls in 2 articles, Aaron Ladd scores 97.88% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 0, which means their calls were no better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 5 calls · one square per call
2hits100% of graded
3waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
2 graded calls in 2 articles, newest first. Every take from Aaron Ladd, including the ones still waiting →
Seattle Seahawks to beat Kansas City
“Two and a half, two and a half Seattle three. Probably lose. So, you know I mean, they have not won a preseason.”
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Aaron Ladd isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Arvell Reese to be picked at number 6
“So but, yeah, we'll gotta be edge rusher. It's gotta be edge rusher. They want Reese... I think it's gotta be Reese. If the Giants don't take him first, that that's my feeling.”