Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

How Accurate Are Election Pundits? 2024 by the Numbers

Every checkable call named pundits made about the 2024 US elections — race winners, margins, chamber control, seat counts — graded against certified results, with a naive guess scored on the same calls beside them. Figures as of 2026-10-06; they move as results are certified and graded.

Cycle: 2026 · 2024 · 2022

Graded calls
580

of 583 on the record

Pundits graded
96
Pundits' accuracy
77.5%
Naive guess
34.4%

the seat's party holds it

How accurate were pundits' 2024 election predictions?

Pundits' checkable 2024 election calls averaged 77.5% accuracy across 580 graded calls from 96 pundits, each scored against the certified result.

Did pundits beat a naive guess?

Accuracy alone flatters anyone who calls safe seats. The naive guess is the bar a call has to clear to have told a reader something.

Yes, by 43.1 points: in 2024 a naive guess — that the party holding each seat keeps it — would have scored 34.4% on the same calls, against the pundits' 77.5%.

Which election calls do pundits get right?

By kind of call. A hit is a call that scored 80 or better.
  • Race Winners462 graded · naive guess 32.5%76.6%
  • Chamber Control53 graded · naive guess 30.2%79.2%
  • Race Margins43 graded · naive guess 53.5%81.4%
  • Seat Counts21 graded · naive guess 46.7%85.7%
  • House Popular Vote Margins1 graded · naive guess 98.3%44.5%
Kind of callGradedHit rateAccuracyNaive guess
Race Winners46276.6%76.6%32.5%
Chamber Control5379.2%79.2%30.2%
Race Margins4362.8%81.4%53.5%
Seat Counts2181.0%85.7%46.7%
House Popular Vote Margins10.0%44.5%98.3%

Where did most pundits get the 2024 elections wrong?

Races and chambers at least three pundits called, where most of them picked someone other than the winner. Each pundit counts once, by their latest call.

Control of the House: 4 of 14 pundits picked Republican, the winner.

Race or chamberWinnerPicked the winnerShare
Control of the HouseRepublican4 of 1428.6%
2024 U.S. presidential election in MichiganDonald Trump5 of 1435.7%
2024 U.S. presidential election in WisconsinDonald Trump4 of 1330.8%
2024 U.S. Senate election in WisconsinTammy Baldwin3 of 742.9%
2024 U.S. Senate election in MichiganElissa Slotkin1 of 333.3%
2024 U.S. House election in Nebraska's district 2Don Bacon0 of 30.0%

Where did most pundits get it right?

The same rule, where the majority picked the winner.
Race or chamberWinnerPicked the winnerShare
2024 U.S. presidential electionDonald Trump34 of 5759.6%
Control of the SenateRepublican30 of 30100.0%
2024 U.S. presidential election in PennsylvaniaDonald Trump11 of 2055.0%
2024 U.S. presidential election in ArizonaDonald Trump16 of 1794.1%
2024 U.S. presidential election in NevadaDonald Trump12 of 1770.6%
2024 U.S. presidential election in North CarolinaDonald Trump16 of 1794.1%
2024 U.S. presidential election in GeorgiaDonald Trump15 of 1693.8%
2024 U.S. Senate election in West VirginiaJim Justice10 of 10100.0%
2024 U.S. Senate election in MontanaTim Sheehy10 of 10100.0%
2024 U.S. Senate election in PennsylvaniaDave McCormick6 of 966.7%
2024 U.S. Senate election in TexasTed Cruz8 of 988.9%
2024 U.S. presidential election in TexasDonald Trump6 of 785.7%

Who is the most accurate election pundit?

Ranked by MissedTakes Score — how much better than the naive guess, not how often right — across every cycle we have graded, not 2024 alone. Only records with ten or more graded articles are ranked; the full list is on the election leaderboard.
PunditScoreAccuracyGraded
1. Clay Travis+74.298.3%27
2. Erick-Woods Erickson+70.395.9%29

Cite these numbers

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with credit and a link to this page. Please give the date — these figures move as results are certified and graded.

MissedTakes, "How Accurate Are Election Pundits? 2024 by the Numbers", missedtakes.co/elections/accuracy, accessed 2026-10-06.

The tables as CSV or markdown. How each call is graded, and the naive guess it is measured against, is in the methodology; every race links to the calls behind its row.