Anita Marks

Not ranked yetBuilding a record: 1 graded article

—MissedTakes Scorevs a naive guess · 0 = no better

100%Accuracyhow often the calls landed

1Graded callsacross 1 article

4Waitingnot graded yet

Is Anita Marks accurate?

Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Anita Marks scores 100% accuracy.

That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.

All 5 calls · one square per call

1hits100% of graded

4waitingnot graded yet

All 87 ranked NFL pundits · dot size = graded calls · hover a dot for the name

How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.

accuracy · graded calls

No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.

Also called, too few graded to rateMock Draft Picks (1)

A kind is rated once it has five graded calls.

100%specific enough to check

75%hedged: a “probably”, a “could”

Hedged vs plain callsOnly 0 hedged calls are graded so far, too few to compare. The comparison appears once there are enough. Compare →

HitCloseMissWaiting

The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.

Anita Marks isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.

Graded articles1 of 30

Ranked at 10 · a full record at 30

Graded calls1 of 5

Kinds rated0

A kind is rated at five graded calls; 1 more kind has fewer

Fernando Mendoza to be picked at number 1

“I do believe he'll go number one overall, And I do believe he'll go to the Raiders, but it's because the Raiders are desperate for a quarterback”

Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 50

How this was scored