Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Locked On Lions (podcast)
Across 2 graded calls in 2 articles, Bradford Banta scores 81.19% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -8.33, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 7 calls · one square per call
1hits50% of graded
1Close50%
5waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
2 graded calls in 2 articles, newest first. Every take from Bradford Banta, including the ones still waiting →
Spencer Fano to be picked at number 17
“Love your fan o pick. Love it. So that's who I had in my mark draft, so to speak.”
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Bradford Banta isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Taylor Decker to be 1st on the depth chart
“Taylor Decker, back... He's, you know, going into his eleventh season.”