Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Sports Illustrated
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Dylan Von Arx scores 42.86% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -76.14, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 4 calls · one square per call
1Close100%
3waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Dylan Von Arx, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
Jacksonville Jaguars 24 — Broncos 20
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Dylan Von Arx isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
“Pick : Jaguars 24, Broncos 20”
Closing line (Sep 20): Broncos by 2.5, total 45.5 · this 24–20 calls a Jaguars win (by 4; the line gave the Jaguars 43%) and fewer points (44).