Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Locked On Chiefs (podcast)
Across 4 graded calls in 2 articles, JC Pearson scores 97.88% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 66.67, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 6 calls · one square per call
4hits100% of graded
2waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
4 graded calls in 2 articles, newest first. Every take from JC Pearson, including the ones still waiting →
Jaden Hicks to make the roster
“I think he was one of those guys that they were given an opportunity to play his way out, but I think he's played his way in because, you know, he he's he's he's flashed the first couple weeks.”
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
JC Pearson isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Kristian Fulton to make the roster
“But you gotta go, Noah Williams, obviously. You gotta go, Monsieur. You gotta go, you know, I I say the next one has gotta be Fulton.”
Felix Anudike-Uzomah to make the roster
“I think he's on the roster... I think he made enough plays to, you know, play his way on.”
Arvell Reese to be picked at number 6
“I don't think that they would have jumped up to six to to take Bane... So I think it's it's gotta be Reese”