Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Pro Football Focus
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Matt Matera scores 0% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -200, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 2 calls · one square per call
1misses100%
1waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Matt Matera, including the ones still waiting →
Josh Williams to be cut
“releasing "the short-yardage and goal-line specialist" running back Sean Tucker in favor of second-year running back Josh Williams.”
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Matt Matera isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.