Loading…
Loading…
Writes at SportsRadio 94WIP Weekends (podcast)
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Vani Hanamirian scores 88.1% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -11.75, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 2 calls · one square per call
1hits100% of graded
1waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Vani Hanamirian, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Vani Hanamirian isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Philadelphia Eagles 17 — Commanders 10
“I think that it's going to be seventeen ten. Eagles, they're gonna ultimately pull up the win.”
Closing line (Sep 13): Eagles by 6, total 43.5 · this 17–10 calls a bigger Eagles win (by 7) and fewer points (27).