Loading…
Loading…
Writes at The Dispatch Podcast
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Barton Swaim scores 0% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 0, which means their calls were no better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are election pundits overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 1 calls · one square per call
1misses100%
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first.
“he says, is Graham Nordone probably gonna win? Yeah. She's probably gonna win, But she's in trouble.”
The same 21, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Barton Swaim isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.