Loading…
Loading…
David Harrison covers the Washington Commanders for Locked On Commanders, with occasional contributions to Locked On Saints. His work focuses heavily on roster construction — projecting 53-man rosters, predicting breakout candidates, and tracking depth chart battles — alongside broader NFL draft and player movement analysis.
More about David Harrison ↓Writes at Locked On Saints (podcast)
Across 248 graded calls in 25 articles, David Harrison scores 63.89% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 10.28, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a limited sample, under thirty graded articles, so treat it with caution. That ranks #57 of 87 ranked NFL pundits on the MissedTakes leaderboard. Their strongest kind of call is Roster Spot Calls (97.65% accuracy across 111 graded calls); their weakest is Mock Draft Picks (64.04% across 120 graded calls).
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 380 calls · one square per call
160hits65% of graded
41Close17%
47misses19%
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
David Harrison covers the Washington Commanders for Locked On Commanders, with occasional contributions to Locked On Saints. His work focuses heavily on roster construction — projecting 53-man rosters, predicting breakout candidates, and tracking depth chart battles — alongside broader NFL draft and player movement analysis.
A longer profile is written once a record reaches 30 graded articles, and published only after a person reviews it.
248 graded calls in 25 articles, newest first — page 1 of 8. Every take from David Harrison, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
132waitingnot graded yet
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Why the ranks differ: a naive guess scores very differently depending on which calls were made, from 15.25% on the hardest record here to 85.71% on the easiest. Accuracy alone flatters easy calls, so by accuracy David Harrison would be #40; the Score measures the lift over a naive guess on the same calls, and that puts this record at #57.
| # | Pundit | Score | Accuracy | Graded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gilberto Manzano | 12.26 | 43.45% | 40 |
| 56 | Kyle Brandt | 11.71 | 53.9% | 105 |
| 57 | David Harrison | 10.28 | 63.89% | 248 |
| 58 | Chris Simms | 9.74 | 56.77% | 98 |
| 59 | Bill Huber | 9.49 | 77.48% | 82 |
Washington Commanders 27 — Philadelphia Eagles 24
“I'm gonna go against the market here in my prediction. I think Commanders come out with a twenty seven twenty four win”
Closing line (Sep 13): Eagles by 6, total 43.5 · this 27–24 calls a Commanders win (by 3; the line gave the Commanders about 1 in 3 (32%)) and more points (51).
Washington Commanders to beat Philadelphia Eagles
“Washington Commanders getting a week win week one win here in the link, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.”
Closing line (Sep 13): Eagles by 6 · underdog pick, Commanders about 1 in 3 (32%).
Washington Commanders to beat Philadelphia Eagles
“This time next week, we will be talking about the Washington commanders' first win of the season having defeated the Philadelphia Eagles on the road in week one to start the season.”
Closing line (Sep 13): Eagles by 6 · underdog pick, Commanders about 1 in 3 (32%).