Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Sports Illustrated
Across 3 graded calls in 3 articles, Emmett Matasovsky scores 47.62% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -34.93, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 6 calls · one square per call
1hits33% of graded
1Close33%
1misses33%
3
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
3 graded calls in 3 articles, newest first. Every take from Emmett Matasovsky, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Emmett Matasovsky isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Detroit Lions to score 37 against Cardinals
“My prediction has Detroit with 37 points, so I will stick with yes, they will.”
Detroit Lions 31 — Panthers 28
“Lions 31, Panthers 28”
Closing line (Oct 4): Lions by 4.5, total 52.5 · this 31–28 calls a closer game (Lions by 3) and more points (59).
Christian Izien to be 1st on the depth chart
“Christian Izien is an option for later in the season, but might be tasked with a starting safety role in Week 1 as Brian Branch and Kerby Joseph rehab their injuries.”