Loading…
Loading…
Writes at The Dan Patrick Show (podcast)
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, ESPN scores 44.24% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -11.52, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 1 calls · one square per call
1Close100%
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from ESPN, including the ones still waiting →
“so here were the rankings... Mahomes One, Josh Allen To Joe burrow Three Lamar jackson Four... Jayde daniels was Five... stafford is Sixth then you Have Justin Herbert, then you Have Jared goff, then you Have jalen hurts and then you Have Baker Mayfield... number Ten... they Said Jordan love and C. J stroud were honorable mention”
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
ESPN isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.