Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Move the Sticks (podcast)
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Jack Foster scores 0% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -167, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 2 calls · one square per call
1misses100%
1waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Jack Foster, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Jack Foster isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
San Francisco 49ers to beat Atlanta Falcons
“I actually like the 40 niners on the road in this one. Okay. It's a field goal spread.”
Closing line (Oct 25): 49ers by 2.5 · favorite pick, 49ers 58%.