Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Locked On Packers (podcast)
Across 3 graded calls in 2 articles, Jeff "Coach Jags" Jagodzinski scores 94.65% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 48.79, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 4 calls · one square per call
3hits100% of graded
1waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
3 graded calls in 2 articles, newest first. Every take from Jeff "Coach Jags" Jagodzinski, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Jeff "Coach Jags" Jagodzinski isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Christian Watson to be 1st on the depth chart
“Do you think Christian Watson is a a true number one receiver in the NFL? ... I think he's everything that you want in a in a wide number one wide receiver.”
Seattle Seahawks 28 — New England Patriots 10
“I think it it'll be I think 28 to 10. I'll I'll go ahead and take Seattle”
Closing line (Feb 8): Seahawks by 4.5, total 45.5 · this 28–10 calls a bigger Seahawks win (by 18) and fewer points (38).
Seattle Seahawks to win the Super Bowl
“but, I think Seattle's so dominant on defense... I'll go ahead and take Seattle”