Joe Haden

Not ranked yetBuilding a record: 4 graded articles

91.52MissedTakes Scorevs a naive guess · 0 = no better

92.82%Accuracyhow often the calls landed

8Graded callsacross 4 articles

13Waitingnot graded yet

Is Joe Haden accurate?

Across 8 graded calls in 4 articles, Joe Haden scores 92.82% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 91.52, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims.

That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

How accurate are NFL experts overall? →

Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.

All 21 calls · one square per call

7hits88% of graded

1misses13%

13waitingnot graded yet

Where Joe Haden stands

All 87 ranked NFL pundits · dot size = graded calls · hover a dot for the name

MissedTakes Score

How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.

By kind

accuracy · graded calls

No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.

Also called, too few graded to rateCombine Measurements (2) · Award Picks (2) · Position Order Calls (1) · Mock Draft Picks (1) · Game Outcome Picks (1) · Super Bowl Picks (1)

A kind is rated once it has five graded calls.

How the calls are made

93.75%specific enough to check

21.88%hedged: a “probably”, a “could”

Hedged vs plain callsOnly 2 hedged calls are graded so far, too few to compare. The comparison appears once there are enough. Compare →

Every graded call, article by article

HitCloseMissWaiting

8 graded calls in 4 articles, newest first. Every take from Joe Haden, including the ones still waiting →

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

Mar 3, 2026
Asked which receiver prospect their team should take, they said Tate is the best of the group and predicted Tate will be the first receiver drafted, with Jordyn Tyson and "Limon" as fallbacks.Position Order Calls · 1 call
1 hit
Show the call and its gradingHide the grading

Feb 27, 2026

Joe (the Browns-affiliated co-host) argues Shedeur Sanders is still the best quarterback of this class but concedes Fernando Mendoza will be the No. 1 overall pick, and they play the combine 40-yard dash props on Caleb Downs, Zachariah Branch and Haynes King.Mock Draft Picks, Combine Measurements · 4 calls

2 hits · 1 miss · 1 waiting · 2 of 3 graded calls landed

Show the 3 graded calls

Fernando Mendoza to be picked at number 1
“So Mendoza zero hate. I hope everything works out successful. He's going to be the number one pick.”
Hit · 100Scored 100a naive guess scored 50
How this was scored
draft:
2026
naive:
a shuffled mock scores 50
player:
Fernando Mendoza
season:
2025
zero credit this far off:
32
accuracy:
100
baseline:
50
actual pick:
1
difficulty:
1
weeks in the season:
18
pick accuracy:
100
predicted pick:
1
weeks left when called:
0
mock ordering score:
only one pick — no order to score
Think this grade is wrong?
Zachariah Branch to post less than four three five at the combine
“Then you got zachar Riot Branch. They saying below... less than four three five? ... Yep. Let's get it there, so you go play this. Let's get it. Yep, I'm gonna play. I'm gonna play this.”
Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 0+0 skill
How this was scored
claim:
less than four three five
drill:
forty time
naive:
the WR median (4.42) misses it
skill:
0
player:
Zachariah Branch
result:
4.35
season:
2025
combine year:
2026
accuracy:
0
baseline:
0
difficulty:
1
weeks in the season:
18
weeks left when called:
0
Combine results via Pro-Football-Reference.com.
Think this grade is wrong?
Haynes King to post he's going run four five at the combine
“You say you're gonna be more so you think you go run four five? Yeah, he's going run for five.”
Hit · 85Scored 85.09a naive guess scored 33.97+51.12 skill
How this was scored
off:
0.04
drill:
forty time
naive:
the average QB (4.73, from 56 results)
scale:
credit halves every 0.17 — one standard deviation for a QB
skill:
51.12
player:
Haynes King
result:
4.46
season:
2025
combine year:
2026
accuracy:
85.09
baseline:
33.97
they said:
4.5
sigmas out:
0.23
difficulty:
1
weeks in the season:
18
weeks left when called:
0
Combine results via Pro-Football-Reference.com.
Think this grade is wrong?