Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Pushing the Pile (podcast)
Across 3 graded calls in 1 article, Jonathan Jones scores 95.83% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 102.08, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 10 calls · one square per call
3hits100% of graded
7waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
3 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Jonathan Jones, including the ones still waiting →
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Jonathan Jones isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Anthony Richardson to be 2nd on the depth chart
“He's going somewhere to be a backup next year to just kinda see what you got. Yeah... But I don't have any evidence from his play that he's going to be able to do that to start '26.”
Will Levis to move to Tennessee Titans
“most likely to be traded out of that group would be Will Levis”
Daniel Jones to be 1st on the depth chart
“Ultimately, I believe that Daniel Jones will be the quarterback of the Colts.”