Loading…
Loading…
Writes at KC Sports Network (podcast)
Across 2 graded calls in 1 article, Matt Hamilton scores 53.57% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -36.42, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 24 calls · one square per call
1hits50% of graded
1misses50%
22waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
2 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Matt Hamilton, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Matt Hamilton isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Denver Broncos 27 — Chiefs 17
“I do think the Broncos are gonna win this game week one. I'm gonna say twenty seven seventeen.”
Closing line (Sep 14): Chiefs by 2.5, total 42.5 · this 27–17 calls a Broncos win (by 10; the line gave the Broncos 46%) and more points (44).
Kansas City Chiefs 24 — Colts 14
“But I think the Chiefs bounced back and beat the Colts. I'm gonna say twenty four fourteen.”