Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Chris Simms Unbuttoned (podcast)
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Phil Simms scores 0% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -194, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 1 calls · one square per call
1misses100%
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Phil Simms, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Phil Simms isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
New York Giants to beat Rams
“Well, I I think the Giants are you know, I think they can hang in there, and I think they can win the game. It won't be easy, especially after the fact that how the Rams played over in Australia.”
Closing line (Sep 21): Rams by 6.5 · underdog pick, Giants 28%.