Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Sports Illustrated
Across 3 graded calls in 1 article, SI Video Staff scores 100% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 114.67, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 9 calls · one square per call
3hits100% of graded
6waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
3 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from SI Video Staff, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
SI Video Staff isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Los Angeles Rams to beat Raiders
“At Raiders, Chargers, Commanders, at Cardinals. ... Does that not look like 6 and 4?”
Closing line (Oct 25): Rams by 3.5 · favorite pick, Rams 62%.
Los Angeles Rams to beat Chargers
“At Raiders, Chargers, Commanders, at Cardinals. ... Does that not look like 6 and 4?”
Los Angeles Rams to beat Commanders
“At Raiders, Chargers, Commanders, at Cardinals. ... Does that not look like 6 and 4?”