Loading…
Loading…
Writes at NFL Live (podcast)
Across 4 graded calls in 2 articles, Tim Hasselbeck scores 72.92% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -20.27, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 6 calls · one square per call
2hits50% of graded
2misses50%
2waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
4 graded calls in 2 articles, newest first. Every take from Tim Hasselbeck, including the ones still waiting →
Ty Simpson to be picked “first round” (picks 1–32)
“I think it will be favorable to Simpson. I think ultimately, probably get him into the first round.”
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Tim Hasselbeck isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Malik Willis to be 1st on the depth chart
“Willis is gonna walk in as the anointed starter somewhere because I think the market's gonna dictate that.”
Isaiah Likely to record 7 receiving tds
“probably getting close to, you know, seven touchdowns”
Isaiah Likely to record 75 receptions
“I think you're talking about a guy who's probably catching, you know, over 75 balls, probably getting close to, you know, seven touchdowns.”