Loading…
Loading…
Writes at NFL Live (podcast)
Every take from Tim Hasselbeck, including the ones still waiting →
Is Tim Hasselbeck accurate? Across 4 graded calls in 2 articles, Tim Hasselbeck scores 72.92% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -20.27, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims. That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
Fewer than 10 graded articles. Treat this as provisional.
80% of their claims were specific enough to check. Most of what they said committed to something.
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below shows its own arithmetic.
Ty Simpson to be picked “first round” (picks 1–32)
“I think it will be favorable to Simpson. I think ultimately, probably get him into the first round.”
Isaiah Likely to record 75 receptions
“I think you're talking about a guy who's probably catching, you know, over 75 balls, probably getting close to, you know, seven touchdowns.”
Isaiah Likely to record 7 receiving tds
“probably getting close to, you know, seven touchdowns”
Malik Willis to be 1st on the depth chart
“Willis is gonna walk in as the anointed starter somewhere because I think the market's gonna dictate that.”