Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Walter Football
Across 2 graded calls in 1 article, Walter Cherepinsky scores 96.43% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 13.04, which means their calls were better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 7 calls · one square per call
2hits100% of graded
5waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
2 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Walter Cherepinsky, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Walter Cherepinsky isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Buffalo Bills to beat Lions
“Week 2 NFL Pick: Bills 31, Lions 24”
Closing line (Sep 17): Bills by 5.5 · favorite pick, Bills about 2 in 3 (68%).
Buffalo Bills 31 — Lions 24
“Week 2 NFL Pick: Bills 31, Lions 24”
Closing line (Sep 17): Bills by 5.5, total 54.5 · this 31–24 calls a bigger Bills win (by 7) and more points (55).