Loading…
Loading…
Writes at The Megyn Kelly Show
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Charles C.W. Cooke scores 100% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 0, which means their calls were no better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are election pundits overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 2 calls · one square per call
1hits100% of graded
1waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first.
“New Hampshire, obviously not pleased with, but I never expect Republicans to win senate races in New Hampshire... Especially in a a blue year, I didn't think that was gonna happen.”
The same 21, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Charles C.W. Cooke isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.