Loading…
Loading…
Writes at Steve Deace Show
Across 3 graded calls in 1 article, Christopher Malone scores 0% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -67.33, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are election pundits overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 3 calls · one square per call
3misses100%
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
3 graded calls in 1 article, newest first.
“Christopher Malone says, Lake Dixon and Mastriano all win their races”
The same 21, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Christopher Malone isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
“Christopher Malone says, Lake Dixon and Mastriano all win their races”
“Christopher Malone says, Lake Dixon and Mastriano all win their races”