Leaderboard Predictions NFL Publishers Posts Methodology Picks

Loading…

A weekly email is coming. Want to hear when it starts?

Website

Your address is kept only for this, never shared, and nothing is sent until the newsletter exists. What we keep.

About Corrections Site Notice Privacy TermsThe GoodApps Company Career App

Leaderboard / Dan Graziano

Dan Graziano

Writes at Sports Illustrated

Every take from Dan Graziano, including the ones still waiting →

Is Dan Graziano accurate? Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Dan Graziano scores 0% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -189, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims. That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.

Accuracy

How often they were right.

-189

MissedTakes Score

Versus a naive guess. 0 means no better.

Graded calls

across 1 article. 5 more not yet settled.

Fewer than 10 graded articles. Treat this as provisional.

100% of their claims were specific enough to check. Most of what they said committed to something.

Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below shows its own arithmetic.

Graded calls · 1

Picked the Seahawks to beat the Commanders in Week 3.Sep 25, 2026
- Seattle Seahawks to beat Commanders
  “ESPN Dan Graziano: Seahawks”
  Miss · 0Scored 0a naive guess scored 100-189 skill
  How this was scored
  won:
  WAS
  score:
  31-33
  skill:
  -189
  they picked:
  SEA
  season:
  2026
  accuracy:
  0
  baseline:
  100
  the naive pick:
  WAS
  difficulty:
  1.89
  weeks in the season:
  18
  weeks left when called:
  16

We grade claims about outcomes, never claims about people. If something here is wrong — a misattributed quote, a claim we misread, a grade you disagree with — tell us and we will look at it.

Think this grade is wrong?