Loading…
Loading…
Published without a byline — this record belongs to the publication rather than to a named writer.
More about Decision Desk HQ Podcast ↓Writes at Decision Desk HQ Podcast
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Decision Desk HQ Podcast scores 0% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of 0, which means their calls were no better than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are election pundits overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 1 calls · one square per call
1misses100%
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
Published without a byline — this record belongs to the publication rather than to a named writer.
A longer profile is written once a record reaches 30 graded articles, and published only after a person reviews it.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first.
“I I still think Paxon, excuse me, Abbott has a better chance. Okay. So 69% chance of winning. So slightly better for Republicans than Florida at least right now.”
The same 21, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Decision Desk HQ Podcast isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.