Loading…
Loading…
Writes at 2 Pros and a Cup of Joe (podcast)
Across 2 graded calls in 2 articles, Jason Fitz scores 50% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -100, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 9 calls · one square per call
1hits50% of graded
1misses50%
7waitingnot graded yet
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
2 graded calls in 2 articles, newest first. Every take from Jason Fitz, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Jason Fitz isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
Jacksonville Jaguars to beat Colts
“Yeah, they're going to get murdered by Jacksonville tomorrow.”
Closing line (Nov 1): Jaguars by 10 · favorite pick, Jaguars about 4 in 5 (80%).
Anthony Richardson to be cut
“And so inevitably, I think he's going to get cut. I don't think he's going to get traded. I think he's going to get cut.”