Loading…
Loading…
Writes at The Herd with Colin Cowherd (podcast)
Across 1 graded call in 1 article, Julian Edelman scores 47.62% accuracy and a MissedTakes Score of -104.76, which means their calls were worse than a naive guess on the same claims.
That is a provisional record, fewer than ten graded articles, so the numbers are not yet meaningful and they are not ranked on the leaderboard.
How accurate are NFL experts overall? →
Every number here is computed from the published methodology, and every call below opens to its own arithmetic.
All 1 calls · one square per call
1Close100%
How much better than a naive guess on the same claims. This is the ranking.
No kind has five graded calls yet, so none is rated.
1 graded calls in 1 article, newest first. Every take from Julian Edelman, including the ones still waiting →
Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.
The same 87, by how often their calls landed, with no credit for difficulty.
Julian Edelman isn’t ranked yet: a record is ranked from 10 graded articles, so a lucky first handful can’t top the table.
New England Patriots 28 — Seattle 24
“Twenty-eight. Seattle, twenty-four. ... Actually, twenty-eight, twenty-four. ... So, you know, I think the Patriots go in, and I think they put a little something in there.”
Closing line (Sep 9): Seahawks by 3, total 44.5 · this 28–24 calls a Patriots win (by 4; the line gave the Patriots 40%) and more points (52).