Skip to main content

Trevor RipleySep 20, 2026

Ripley picks the Bears to beat the Vikings at Soldier Field in Week 2, 30-19, arguing Minnesota's offense is hobbled by injuries while Chicago's offense edges an aggressive but star-thin Vikings defense.

Published in writing · Sports IllustratedRead the original

0 of 1calls landed1 miss · 1 waiting
38.1Average accuracyout of 100, across 1 call
34.5A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
1Games calledeveryone’s picks below
1Waitingnot graded yet

What Trevor Ripley said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
Bears: 30 Vikings: 19
Trevor Ripley, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was published
Sports Illustrated
The piece
Vikings at Bears: Who Wins And Why in Week 2
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidSep 20
  2. PlayedSep 20
  3. GradedSep 21
  1. 1Chicago Bears 30 — Vikings 19“Verdict Bears: 30 Vikings: 19”
  2. 2Carson Wentz to be 1st on the depth chart“Carson Wentz will get the nod at quarterback this week as Kyler Murray continues to recover from a concussion.”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Chicago Bears 30 — Vikings 191Score PredictionsVikings 9–338.134.49+7
Carson Wentz to be 1st on the depth chart2Depth Chart Calls————
2 calls · 1 miss · 1 waiting38.134.5

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 1 depth chart call and 1 score prediction — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 3 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

1 of 2 have settled so far, averaging 38.1 out of 100, against 34.5 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

Where this call stands in the room

Carson Wentz · 2026 season

17 calls from 14 pundits between 1 and 2. Trevor Ripley said 1. the room's median is 2. not settled yet

Trevor Ripley — 1the room — 17 calls from 14 punditsmedian 2

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

  1. 1Score PredictionsChicago Bears

    Chicago Bears 30 — Vikings 19

    What happenedVikings 9–3called Bears by 11 · lost by 6
    38.1Miss · naive 34.49
    38.1this call34.49a naive guess3.61better than naive1.94difficulty+7skill

    Closing line (Sep 20): Bears by 4.5, total 46.5 · this 30–19 calls a bigger Bears win (by 11) and more points (49).

    How this was scored
    score:
    9-3
    skill:
    7
    they picked:
    CHI
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    38.1
    baseline:
    34.49
    difficulty:
    1.94
    weeks in the season:
    18
    actual margin:
    6
    weeks left when called:
    17
    naive home margin:
    −0.52
    predicted margin:
    11
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Depth Chart CallsCarson WentzMinnesota Vikings

    Carson Wentz to be 1st on the depth chart

    VerdictWaiting

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

The game in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.