Skip to main content

Andrew Erickson#30 of 87 NFL pundits · Oct 1, 2025

Erickson stayed high on Ja'Marr Chase (WR6) and Jaylen Waddle (WR14), backed a Ladd McConkey bounce-back against Washington, was low on Jordan Addison (WR40) and AJ Brown (WR23), and floated Jerry Jeudy as a fringe top-36 play.

Said on air or in an interview · FantasyPros Fantasy Football Podcast (podcast)Hear the original

1 of 1calls landed1 hit · 1 too vague to check
100Average accuracyout of 100, across 1 call
91.7A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
1 of 2Settlednone still waiting · 1 too vague to check
#30Andrew Erickson’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Andrew Erickson said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
So that's why I'm buying the dip on Jamar Chase ... So I'm starting him no matter what.
Andrew Erickson, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
The episode
FantasyPros - Week 5 Fantasy Football Wide Receiver Rankings & Tiers: Studs, Sleepers, and Must-Starts (Ep. 1745)
The original
Hear the original

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence here are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

  1. SaidOct 1, 2025
  2. GradedAug 5, 2026
  1. 1Ladd McConkey to be 2nd on the depth chart“Yes, he's more of that wide receiver too, just because I don't think the other guys completely go away. But Yeah, I'm in on Lad this week.”
  2. 2Positional Finishes“he will see least enough volume to probably maybe crack in the top thirty six, but probably not be better than like a top thirty receiver when the dust settles”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Ladd McConkey to be 2nd on the depth chart1Depth Chart CallsNo. 210091.67+14.83
“he will see least enough volume to probably maybe crack in the…”2Positional Finishes————
2 calls · 1 hit · 1 too vague to check10091.7

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 claims — 1 depth chart call and 1 positional finish — the one we can check graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 4 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

The one call we can check scored 100 out of 100, against 91.7 for a naive guess at the same calls.

The other one was too vague to check, so it is not graded.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

Their call against what happened

2They said
2What happened

Their call against what actually happened.

  1. 1Depth Chart CallsLadd McConkeyLos Angeles Chargers

    Ladd McConkey to be 2nd on the depth chart

    What happenedNo. 2called No. 2 · by receptions
    100Hit · naive 91.67
    100this call91.67a naive guess8.33better than naive1.78difficulty+14.83skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    LAC
    skill:
    14.83
    player:
    Ladd McConkey
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    91.67
    position:
    WR
    naive slot:
    1
    actual slot:
    2
    difficulty:
    1.78
    measured by:
    receptions
    the naive guess:
    where he sat last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    predicted slot:
    2
    weeks left when called:
    14
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Positional FinishesJerry JeudyCleveland Browns

    “he will see least enough volume to probably maybe crack in the top thirty six, but probably not be better than like a top thirty receiver when the dust settles”

    VerdictToo vague to check

    Too vague to check: we could not tell what would count as right, so it stays on the record without a score.

Others on the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.