Skip to main content

Gregg Rosenthal#39 of 87 NFL pundits · Jan 3, 2025

Rosenthal's Week 18 picks: Tampa Bay routs the resting Saints, Seattle beats a Rams team sitting its starters, and Washington handles a Cowboys team playing for nothing. They also lean Pittsburgh over Cincinnati (off-show) and says they liked the Titans to win.

Said on air or in an interview · Around the NFL (podcast)Hear the original

1 of 2calls landed1 hit · 1 miss · all settled
50Average accuracyout of 100, across 2 calls
0A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
2 of 2Settlednone still waiting
#39Gregg Rosenthal’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Gregg Rosenthal said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
I love it. I think they can cover this thing by the end of the first half.
Gregg Rosenthal, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was said
Around the NFL (podcast)
The episode
Week 18 Picks with Cynthia Frelund
The original
Hear the original

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence here are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

  1. SaidJan 3, 2025
  2. GradedAug 17, 2026
  1. 1Tennessee Titans to beat Texans“I would have thrown in the Titans winning as a Greg Strow, but everyone is on my side, and that's actually now they're the favorite over the Texans.”
  2. 2Washington Commanders to beat Cowboys“I do think ultimately that Washington game does get out of control, because that's going to be my third pick... I'm going to Washington minus four and a half.”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Tennessee Titans to beat Texans1Game Outcome Picks—000
Washington Commanders to beat Cowboys2Game Outcome Picks—1000+106
2 calls · 1 hit · 1 miss · all settled500

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 2 game outcome picks — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 2 have settled, averaging 50 out of 100, against 0 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Game Outcome PicksTennessee Titans

    Tennessee Titans to beat Texans

    VerdictMiss
    0Miss · naive 0
    0this call0a naive guess0better than naive1.06difficulty0skill

    Closing line (Jan 5): Titans by 2.5 · favorite pick, Titans 56%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    HOU
    score:
    23-14
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    TEN
    season:
    2024
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    TEN
    difficulty:
    1.06
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    1
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Game Outcome PicksWashington Commanders

    Washington Commanders to beat Cowboys

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive1.06difficulty+106skill

    Closing line (Jan 5): Commanders by 7 · favorite pick, Commanders about 3 in 4 (73%). Graded on who won, not on the spread.

    How this was scored
    won:
    WAS
    score:
    23-19
    skill:
    106
    they picked:
    WAS
    season:
    2024
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    DAL
    difficulty:
    1.06
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    1
    Think this is wrong?
  3. All

    The take as a whole

    the average of 2 settled calls, each counted once

    50naive 0

Others on the same people

More game outcome picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.