Skip to main content

Gregg Rosenthal#39 of 87 NFL pundits · Jan 9, 2026

Rosenthal makes three playoff picks: the Packers over the Bears, the Rams over the Panthers, and the Texans over the Steelers, arguing Green Bay has the better quarterback in Jordan Love, that Carolina can't keep up with the Rams' running game, and that Houston's defense is a mismatch for a Pittsburgh "house of cards."

Said on air or in an interview · Move the Sticks (podcast)Hear the original

1 of 2calls landed1 hit · 1 miss · all settled
50Average accuracyout of 100, across 2 calls
50A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
2 of 2Settlednone still waiting
#39Gregg Rosenthal’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Gregg Rosenthal said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
I think they're a better team, and I think the Green Bay Packers win.
Gregg Rosenthal, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was said
Move the Sticks (podcast)
The episode
Wild Card Weekend Picks and Dolphins Fire Mike McDaniel with Cynthia Frelund
The original
Hear the original

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence here are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

  1. SaidJan 9
  2. GradedAug 17
  1. 1Los Angeles Rams to beat Carolina Panthers“I will take the Rams minus ten and a half... I just don't think the Panthers can keep up in a game like that.”
  2. 2Green Bay Packers to beat Bears“I think the Green Bay Packers are going to win... I just think they're a better team, and I think the Green Bay Packers win. So that is my first pick.”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Los Angeles Rams to beat Carolina Panthers1Game Outcome Picks—1000+100
Green Bay Packers to beat Bears2Game Outcome Picks—0100−100
2 calls · 1 hit · 1 miss · all settled5050

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naiveworse than naive

2 checkable claims — 2 game outcome picks — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 2 have settled, averaging 50 out of 100, against 50 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Game Outcome PicksLos Angeles Rams

    Los Angeles Rams to beat Carolina Panthers

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive1difficulty+100skill

    Closing line (Jan 10): Rams by 10 · favorite pick, Rams about 4 in 5 (81%). Graded on who won, not on the spread.

    How this was scored
    won:
    LAR
    score:
    34-31
    skill:
    100
    they picked:
    LAR
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    CAR
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    0
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Game Outcome PicksGreen Bay Packers

    Green Bay Packers to beat Bears

    VerdictMiss
    0Miss · naive 100
    0this call100a naive guess−100worse than naive1difficulty−100skill

    Closing line (Jan 10): Packers by 2.5 · favorite pick, Packers 55%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    CHI
    score:
    27-31
    skill:
    −100
    they picked:
    GB
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    CHI
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    0
    Think this is wrong?
  3. All

    The take as a whole

    the average of 2 settled calls, each counted once

    50naive 50

Others on the same people

More game outcome picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.