Skip to main content

Mark ChichesterAug 24, 2026

Unsigned PFF piece reporting/asserting that Deshaun Watson will be Cleveland's Week 1 starting quarterback against Jacksonville, with Shedeur Sanders behind them on the depth chart.

Published in writing · Pro Football FocusRead the original

1 of 1calls landed1 hit · 1 waiting
100Average accuracyout of 100, across 1 call
0A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
1Games calledeveryone’s picks below
1Waitingnot graded yet

What Mark Chichester said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
Watson won the competition and, with it, the right to start Week 1.
Mark Chichester, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was published
Pro Football Focus
The piece
Deshaun Watson named Browns’ starting quarterback for Week 1
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidAug 24
  2. PlayedSep 13
  3. GradedSep 18
  1. 1Deshaun Watson to be 1st on the depth chart“Deshaun Watson will start for the Browns against the Jaguars in Week 1 after emerging from Cleveland’s four-man quarterback competition.”
  2. 2Shedeur Sanders to be 2nd on the depth chart“Sanders will begin the season behind him after producing the stronger PFF passing grade during their preseason auditions”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Deshaun Watson to be 1st on the depth chart1Depth Chart Calls—1000+200
Shedeur Sanders to be 2nd on the depth chart2Depth Chart Calls————
2 calls · 1 hit · 1 waiting1000

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 2 depth chart calls — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 3 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

1 of 2 have settled so far, averaging 100 out of 100, against 0 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the rest of the room.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

Where this call stands in the room

Shedeur Sanders · 2026 season

63 calls from 41 pundits between 1 and 3. Mark Chichester said 2. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Mark Chichester — 2the room — 63 calls from 41 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

  1. 1Depth Chart CallsDeshaun WatsonCleveland Browns

    Deshaun Watson to be 1st on the depth chart

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive2difficulty+200skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    CLE
    week:
    1
    skill:
    200
    player:
    Deshaun Watson
    season:
    2026
    claimed:
    he starts
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    position:
    quarterback
    reported:
    named the starter
    settled by:
    a confirmed report from the crawl (reported outcomes)
    difficulty:
    2
    the naive guess:
    no prior season — a rookie is assumed to start behind the incumbent
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Depth Chart CallsShedeur SandersCleveland Browns

    Shedeur Sanders to be 2nd on the depth chart

    VerdictWaiting

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

The game in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.