Skip to main content

Zachary PerelesAug 22, 2026

The unsigned recap argues Sanders clearly outplayed Watson and, even if Sanders isn't named the Week 1 starter, predicts both quarterbacks will see significant playing time in 2026.

Published in writing · CBS SportsRead the original

1 of 1calls landed1 hit · 1 waiting
100Average accuracyout of 100, across 1 call
0A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
1Games calledeveryone’s picks below
1Waitingnot graded yet

What Zachary Pereles said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
there's a good chance we see both quarterbacks play significant snaps in 2026
Zachary Pereles, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was published
CBS Sports
The piece
Browns quarterback battle: Shedeur Sanders decent in start, Deshaun Watson struggles, both throw interceptions
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidAug 22
  2. PlayedSep 13
  3. GradedSep 18
  1. 1Deshaun Watson to be 1st on the depth chart“even if it's not deemed enough for him to start Week 1, there's a good chance we see both quarterbacks play significant snaps in 2026”
  2. 2Shedeur Sanders to be 1st on the depth chart“there's a good chance we see both quarterbacks play significant snaps in 2026”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Deshaun Watson to be 1st on the depth chart1Depth Chart Calls—1000+200
Shedeur Sanders to be 1st on the depth chart2Depth Chart Calls————
2 calls · 1 hit · 1 waiting1000

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 2 depth chart calls — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 3 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

1 of 2 have settled so far, averaging 100 out of 100, against 0 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

Where this call stands in the room

Shedeur Sanders · 2026 season

59 calls from 41 pundits between 1 and 3. Zachary Pereles said 1. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Zachary Pereles — 1the room — 59 calls from 41 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

  1. 1Depth Chart CallsDeshaun WatsonCleveland Browns

    Deshaun Watson to be 1st on the depth chart

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive2difficulty+200skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    CLE
    week:
    1
    skill:
    200
    player:
    Deshaun Watson
    season:
    2026
    claimed:
    he starts
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    position:
    quarterback
    reported:
    named the starter
    settled by:
    a confirmed report from the crawl (reported outcomes)
    difficulty:
    2
    the naive guess:
    no prior season — a rookie is assumed to start behind the incumbent
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Depth Chart CallsShedeur SandersCleveland Browns

    Shedeur Sanders to be 1st on the depth chart

    VerdictWaiting

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

The game in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.