Loading…
Loading…
QB · Oklahoma; Alabama
48 checkable claims from 36 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
2020 NFL Scouting Combine. Drills not listed were not performed. Combine results via Pro-Football-Reference.com.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Jalen Hurts, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 78% of the room, across 2 articles · 31.7 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bullish than 78% of the room, across articles · 55.0 accuracy on him (1 settled)
Page 2 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
“But is definitely top five and he's at five.”
more bullish than 77% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 100% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 94% of the room, across 2 articles · 47.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 83% of the room, across 2 articles · 100.0 accuracy on him (2 settled)
“So Hurts and Daniels on the list. Take away Dak and Gino and put in Hurts and Daniels”
“And again I think Jalen Hurts is probably ten best in the league. But I do think he's he's a top ten franchise quarterback.”
“I would give Hurts probably the slight edge... But for right now, I think that's there's no problem putting Hurts five.”
“the rushing touchdowns are going anywhere Toush push or not, doesn't matter. He's going to run for ten plus.”
“Jalen Hurts ... 673.3 11.2”
“Jalen Hurts PHI QB ... 4,069.2”
“Jalen Hurts ... 149.6 673.3 11.2”