Skip to main content

John Middlekauff#48 of 87 NFL pundits · Jan 5, 2026

Middlekauff leaned Jacksonville over Buffalo, expected the Rams to beat Carolina, picked Miami over Ole Miss and Indiana over Oregon, and said Fernando Mendoza is a no-brainer No. 1 overall pick who the Raiders will draft first.

Said on air or in an interview · The Colin Cowherd Podcast (podcast)Hear the original

2 of 3calls landed2 hits · 1 miss · all settled
66.7Average accuracyout of 100, across 3 calls
16.7A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
3 of 3Settlednone still waiting
#48John Middlekauff’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What John Middlekauff said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
But just based on the way they're playing, it'd be hard to go against the Jags.
John Middlekauff, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
The episode
Week 18 Games Were AWFUL, NFL Playoff Preview, College Football Playoff Predictions
The original
Hear the original

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence here are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

  1. SaidJan 4
  2. GradedAug 5–17
  1. 1Los Angeles Rams to beat Carolina“Now I'd be stunned if they won, but I could see if the weather's weird, you just never know.”
  2. 2Jacksonville Jaguars to beat Bills“But just based on the way they're playing, it'd be hard to go against the Jags.”
  3. 3Fernando Mendoza to be picked at number 1“now they're going to draft Fernando Mendoza number one overall... I think he's no brainer number one based on this CLASS”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Los Angeles Rams to beat Carolina1Game Outcome Picks—1000+100
Jacksonville Jaguars to beat Bills2Game Outcome Picks—000
Fernando Mendoza to be picked at number 13Mock Draft PicksWent 110050—
3 calls · 2 hits · 1 miss · all settled66.716.7

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

3 checkable claims — 2 game outcome picks and 1 mock draft pick — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 4 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 3 have settled, averaging 66.7 out of 100, against 16.7 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Game Outcome PicksLos Angeles Rams

    Los Angeles Rams to beat Carolina

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive1difficulty+100skill

    Closing line (Jan 10): Rams by 10 · favorite pick, Rams about 4 in 5 (81%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    LAR
    score:
    34-31
    skill:
    100
    they picked:
    LAR
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    CAR
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    0
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Game Outcome PicksJacksonville Jaguars

    Jacksonville Jaguars to beat Bills

    VerdictMiss
    0Miss · naive 0
    0this call0a naive guess0better than naive1difficulty0skill

    Closing line (Jan 11): Jaguars by 1.5 · a toss-up, Bills 47%, Jaguars 53%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    BUF
    score:
    27-24
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    JAX
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    JAX
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    0
    Think this is wrong?
  3. 3Mock Draft PicksFernando MendozaLas Vegas Raiders

    Fernando Mendoza to be picked at number 1

    What happenedWent 1mocked at 1
    100Hit · naive 50
    How this was scored
    draft:
    2026
    naive:
    a shuffled mock scores 50
    player:
    Fernando Mendoza
    season:
    2025
    zero credit this far off:
    32
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    50
    actual pick:
    1
    difficulty:
    1
    weeks in the season:
    18
    pick accuracy:
    100
    predicted pick:
    1
    weeks left when called:
    0
    mock ordering score:
    only one pick — no order to score
    Think this is wrong?
  4. All

    The take as a whole

    the average of 3 settled calls, each counted once

    66.7naive 16.7

Others on the same people

More game outcome picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.