Skip to main content

Logan LazarczykAug 8, 2026

Lazarczyk predicts Kirk Cousins will be the Raiders' Week 1 starting quarterback, with rookie Fernando Mendoza beginning the season on the bench as the backup.

Published in writing · Sports IllustratedRead the original

1 of 1calls landed1 hit · 1 waiting
100Average accuracyout of 100, across 1 call
0A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
1Games calledeveryone’s picks below
1Waitingnot graded yet

What Logan Lazarczyk said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
Barring Mendoza blowing Cousins out of the water, I don't see a scenario in which the rookie quarterback usurps the veteran as the Week 1 starter.
Logan Lazarczyk, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was published
Sports Illustrated
The piece
Raiders' Kubiak Details Fernando Mendoza’s Progress in Training Camp
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidAug 8
  2. PlayedSep 13
  3. GradedSep 18
  1. 1Kirk Cousins to be 1st on the depth chart“Barring Mendoza blowing Cousins out of the water, I don't see a scenario in which the rookie quarterback usurps the veteran as the Week 1 starter.”
  2. 2Fernando Mendoza to be 2nd on the depth chart“the smart approach is to stay on the course and allow Mendoza to learn from the bench while Cousins takes the reins”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Kirk Cousins to be 1st on the depth chart1Depth Chart Calls—1000+200
Fernando Mendoza to be 2nd on the depth chart2Depth Chart Calls————
2 calls · 1 hit · 1 waiting1000

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 2 depth chart calls — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 3 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

1 of 2 have settled so far, averaging 100 out of 100, against 0 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the rest of the room.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

Where this call stands in the room

Fernando Mendoza · 2026 season

81 calls from 53 pundits between 1 and 3. Logan Lazarczyk said 2. the room's median is 1. not settled yet

Logan Lazarczyk — 2the room — 81 calls from 53 punditsmedian 1

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

  1. 1Depth Chart CallsKirk CousinsLas Vegas Raiders

    Kirk Cousins to be 1st on the depth chart

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive2difficulty+200skill
    How this was scored
    club:
    LV
    week:
    1
    skill:
    200
    player:
    Kirk Cousins
    season:
    2026
    claimed:
    he starts
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    position:
    quarterback
    reported:
    named the starter
    naive slot:
    2
    settled by:
    a confirmed report from the crawl (reported outcomes)
    difficulty:
    2
    the naive guess:
    he keeps the job he had last season
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Depth Chart CallsFernando MendozaLas Vegas Raiders

    Fernando Mendoza to be 2nd on the depth chart

    VerdictWaiting

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

The game in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.