Loading…
Loading…
WR · Georgia
50 checkable claims from 32 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on George Pickens, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 75% of the room, across 2 articles · 100.0 accuracy on him (1 settled)
more bullish than 67% of the room, across 3 articles · 5.5 accuracy on him (3 settled)
more bearish than 77% of the room, across 12 articles · on him not settled yet
more bearish than 66% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
Page 1 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
Not settled yet. These are graded once the season or event they describe has finished.
“I could pay George Pickens in that T Higgins range.”
“pick going and pick going to the Raiders. I'm telling you, I'm putting that in the universe right now”
“Dallas if Pickens is what they think, would have to lock them into a long term extension”
“George Pickens, baby breakout season here... for a player that I'm comfortably ranking him aggressively as a wide receiver two and he's being drafted as a wide receiver three”
“it's George Pickens. He is inappropriately priced. I mean he's seventy first overall in ECR wide receiver thirty two.”
“He's probably the maybe, what, the third best receiver in the NFL this year?”