Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Nate Silver· Sep 25, 2026

Silver argued that despite a weaker New York Times poll, Abdul El-Sayed is still likely to win the Michigan Senate race, even while paying a few points of a progressive penalty.

“The poll is consistent with El-Sayed paying a progressive “tax” of a few points, but probably still winning.”

published in writing · The Intersection (Patrick Ruffini) · read the original →

One checkable claim, graded on its own against what actually happened.

Nothing to score yet: this grades once the result is in.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

1 checkable claim in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Race WinnersSep 25, 2026

    “In Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed had led by 3.3 points in the FLIPR polling average prior to the NYT poll, so the poll should actually help him. The poll is consistent with El-Sayed paying a progressive “tax” of a few points, but probably still winning.”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

More race winners

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.