Skip to main content

Albert Breer#35 of 87 NFL pundits · Oct 15, 2026

Breer picked winners for all 14 Week 6 games, including the Texans over the Jaguars in London, the Panthers over the Eagles and the Packers over the Cowboys.

Published in writing · Sports IllustratedRead the original

9 of 14calls landed9 hits · 5 misses · all settled
64.3Average accuracyout of 100, across 14 calls
42.9A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
14Games calledeveryone’s picks below
#35Albert Breer’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Albert Breer said

Albert Breer, the lead quote

Where it was published
Sports Illustrated
The piece
NFL Week 6 Picks From the MMQB Staff: Packers Could Gain Momentum With Win Over Cowboys
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidOct 15
  2. PlayedOct 15–19
  3. GradedOct 16–20

Box score, by kind

HitCloseMissWaiting
GroupHitsCloseMissesWaitingCalls
Game Outcome Picks9050
All9050

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

14 checkable claims — 14 game outcome picks — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 14 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 14 have settled, averaging 64.3 out of 100, against 42.9 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

Game Outcome Picks9 hits · 5 missesShow ▸
  1. San Francisco 49ers to beat Commanders

    “Commanders at 49ers — Albert Breer: 49ers”

    San Francisco 49ers

    49ers 23–17Commanders at 49ers
    100Hit

    100 − 100 naive = 0 × 1.72 difficulty = 0 skill

    Closing line (Oct 19): 49ers by 7.5 · favorite pick, 49ers about 3 in 4 (77%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    SF
    score:
    17-23
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    SF
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    SF
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  2. Green Bay Packers to beat Cowboys

    “Cowboys at Packers — Albert Breer: Packers”

    Green Bay Packers

    Packers 23–13Cowboys at Packers
    100Hit

    100 − 100 naive = 0 × 1.72 difficulty = 0 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Cowboys by 1.5 · a toss-up, Cowboys 51%, Packers 49%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    GB
    score:
    13-23
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    GB
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    GB
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  3. Kansas City Chiefs to beat Chargers

    “Chargers at Chiefs — Albert Breer: Chiefs”

    Kansas City Chiefs

    Chiefs 22–6Chargers at Chiefs
    100Hit

    100 − 100 naive = 0 × 1.72 difficulty = 0 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Chiefs by 7.5 · favorite pick, Chiefs about 4 in 5 (79%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    KC
    score:
    6-22
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    KC
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    KC
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  4. Buffalo Bills to beat Raiders

    “Bills at Raiders — Albert Breer: Bills”

    Buffalo Bills

    Bills 33–30Bills at Raiders
    100Hit

    100 − 0 naive = 100 × 1.72 difficulty = +172 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Bills by 5.5 · favorite pick, Bills about 2 in 3 (68%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    BUF
    score:
    33-30
    skill:
    172
    they picked:
    BUF
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    LV
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  5. Pittsburgh Steelers to beat Buccaneers

    “Steelers at Buccaneers — Albert Breer: Steelers”

    Pittsburgh Steelers

    Steelers 26–19Steelers at Buccaneers
    100Hit

    100 − 0 naive = 100 × 1.72 difficulty = +172 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Steelers by 2.5 · favorite pick, Steelers 56%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    PIT
    score:
    26-19
    skill:
    172
    they picked:
    PIT
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    TB
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  6. Los Angeles Rams to beat Cardinals

    “Cardinals at Rams — Albert Breer: Rams”

    Los Angeles Rams

    Cardinals 18–16Cardinals at Rams
    0Miss

    0 − 0 naive = 0 × 1.72 difficulty = 0 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Rams by 12.5 · favorite pick, Rams about 5 in 6 (84%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    ARI
    score:
    18-16
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    LAR
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    LAR
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  7. Baltimore Ravens to beat Browns

    “Ravens at Browns — Albert Breer: Ravens”

    Baltimore Ravens

    Browns 13–10Ravens at Browns
    0Miss

    0 − 100 naive = −100 × 1.72 difficulty = −172 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Ravens by 3 · favorite pick, Ravens 60%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    CLE
    score:
    10-13
    skill:
    −172
    they picked:
    BAL
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    CLE
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  8. New England Patriots to beat Jets

    “Jets at Patriots — Albert Breer: Patriots”

    New England Patriots

    Patriots 26–19Jets at Patriots
    100Hit

    100 − 100 naive = 0 × 1.72 difficulty = 0 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Patriots by 7.5 · favorite pick, Patriots about 3 in 4 (74%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    NE
    score:
    19-26
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    NE
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    NE
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  9. Carolina Panthers to beat Eagles

    “Panthers at Eagles — Albert Breer: Panthers”

    Carolina Panthers

    Panthers 25–14Panthers at Eagles
    100Hit

    100 − 0 naive = 100 × 1.72 difficulty = +172 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Panthers by 3 · favorite pick, Panthers 59%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    CAR
    score:
    25-14
    skill:
    172
    they picked:
    CAR
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    PHI
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  10. Chicago Bears to beat Falcons

    “Bears at Falcons — Albert Breer: Bears”

    Chicago Bears

    Bears 31–23Bears at Falcons
    100Hit

    100 − 0 naive = 100 × 1.72 difficulty = +172 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Bears by 1.5 · a toss-up, Bears 52%, Falcons 48%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    CHI
    score:
    31-23
    skill:
    172
    they picked:
    CHI
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    ATL
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  11. Indianapolis Colts to beat Titans

    “Titans at Colts — Albert Breer: Colts”

    Indianapolis Colts

    Titans 26–20Titans at Colts
    0Miss

    0 − 0 naive = 0 × 1.72 difficulty = 0 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Colts by 6.5 · favorite pick, Colts 72%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    TEN
    score:
    26-20
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    IND
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    IND
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  12. Houston Texans to beat Jaguars

    “Texans vs. Jaguars (London, England) — Albert Breer: Texans”

    Houston Texans

    Texans 34–31Texans at Jaguars
    100Hit

    100 − 0 naive = 100 × 1.72 difficulty = +172 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): Jaguars by 2.5 · underdog pick, Texans 44%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    HOU
    score:
    34-31
    skill:
    172
    they picked:
    HOU
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    JAX
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  13. New York Giants to beat Saints

    “Saints at Giants — Albert Breer: Giants”

    New York Giants

    Saints 34–27Saints at Giants
    0Miss

    0 − 0 naive = 0 × 1.72 difficulty = 0 skill

    Closing line (Oct 18): a toss-up, about even (Saints 50%, Giants 50%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    NO
    score:
    34-27
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    NYG
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    NYG
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?
  14. Seattle Seahawks to beat Broncos

    “Seahawks at Broncos — Albert Breer: Seahawks”

    Seattle Seahawks

    Broncos 17–14Seahawks at Broncos
    0Miss

    0 − 100 naive = −100 × 1.72 difficulty = −172 skill

    Closing line (Oct 15): Seahawks by 2.5 · favorite pick, Seahawks 58%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    DEN
    score:
    14-17
    skill:
    −172
    they picked:
    SEA
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    DEN
    difficulty:
    1.72
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    13
    Think this is wrong?

The games in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More game outcome picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.