Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Rich Hribar· Sep 17, 2026

In his Week 2 Colts-Chiefs worksheet, Hribar assigns fantasy tiers to the key players: Mahomes as a fringe QB1, Daniel Jones as a 2QB-only option, Jonathan Taylor as a volume-based RB1, Kenneth Walker as a trust/spike play, Rashee Rice as a WR2, Pierce and Worthy as WR3/FLEX and WR4/FLEX, Downs as a WR4/FLEX, Allen as a touchdown-dependent FLEX, and Kelce as a back-end TE1. He also expects Kansas City to lean on the run and Mansoor Delane to return.

“I am still treating Mahomes as a fringe QB1 because I don't want to chase the rushing component being sticky”

published in writing · Sharp Football Analysis · read the original →

6 checkable claims — 5 positional finishes and 1 availability call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 8 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 5 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Patrick Mahomes · 2026 season · positional finish

4 calls from 4 pundits between 5 positional finish and 12 positional finish. Rich Hribar said 12 positional finish. the room's median is 5 positional finish. not settled yet

Rich Hribar — 12 positional finishthe room — 4 calls from 4 punditsmedian 5 positional finish

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Their call against the room

positional finish
48They said
42The room (3 pundits)

Their call against everyone else's, while this is still unsettled.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

6 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More positional finishes

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these