Skip to main content

John Middlekauff#48 of 87 NFL pundits · Sep 6, 2025

Middlekauff likes Seattle as the best long shot to win the NFC West and expects the 49ers to be solid, while picking Minnesota over Chicago in a low-scoring Week 1 game they estimate around 17-14.

Said on air or in an interview · The Colin Cowherd Podcast (podcast)Hear the original

2 of 2calls landed2 hits · all settled
100Average accuracyout of 100, across 2 calls
0A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
2 of 2Settlednone still waiting
#48John Middlekauff’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What John Middlekauff said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
I like Minnesota in this game.
John Middlekauff, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
The episode
Prime Cuts - Cowboys Impressive In Loss To Eagles, NFL Win Totals, Belichick’s Disastrous Start At UNC
The original
Hear the original

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence here are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

  1. SaidSep 6, 2025
  2. GradedAug 17, 2026
  1. 1Seattle Seahawks to win the division“to me, there is not a better long shot on the board to win their division than five to one Seattle”
  2. 2Minnesota Vikings to beat Chicago“I like Minnesota in this game... I expect this to be a lower scoring like seventeen to fourteen type game, and if in that situation, I'm just gonna take Flores in Minnesota”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Seattle Seahawks to win the division1Division Winners—1000+200
Minnesota Vikings to beat Chicago2Game Outcome Picks—1000+200
2 calls · 2 hits · all settled1000

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 1 division winner and 1 game outcome pick — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 2 have settled, averaging 100 out of 100, against 0 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Division WinnersSeattle Seahawks

    Seattle Seahawks to win the division

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive2difficulty+200skill
    How this was scored
    skill:
    200
    method:
    division winners read off the bracket: the bye teams and the wild-card hosts
    they picked:
    SEA
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    LAR
    difficulty:
    2
    the naive guess:
    last season's winner of the same division
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    won the division:
    yes
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Game Outcome PicksMinnesota Vikings

    Minnesota Vikings to beat Chicago

    VerdictHit
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive2difficulty+200skill

    Closing line (Sep 8): Vikings by 1.5 · a toss-up, Vikings 50%, Bears 50%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    MIN
    score:
    27-24
    skill:
    200
    they picked:
    MIN
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    CHI
    difficulty:
    2
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    18
    Think this is wrong?
  3. All

    The take as a whole

    the average of 2 settled calls, each counted once

    100naive 0

Others on the same people

More division winners

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.