Skip to main content

Bill Huber#59 of 87 NFL pundits · Oct 3, 2026

Huber argues the Packers will beat the Buccaneers on Sunday, citing the quarterback mismatch between Jordan Love and undrafted rookie Jalon Daniels, Green Bay's revamped interior offensive line, and a more manageable run-defense assignment in Bucky Irving. They also indicate newly signed veteran Laken Tomlinson is expected to start at left guard.

Published in writing · Sports IllustratedRead the original

1 of 1calls landed1 hit · 1 waiting
100Average accuracyout of 100, across 1 call
0A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
1Games calledeveryone’s picks below
#59Bill Huber’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Bill Huber said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
If that’s the case, the Packers should win – and perhaps comfortably.
Bill Huber, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was published
Sports Illustrated
The piece
Winning Welcome: Three Reasons Why Packers Will Beat Buccaneers
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidOct 3
  2. PlayedOct 4
  3. GradedOct 5
  1. 1Green Bay Packers to beat Buccaneers“The Packers will win on Sunday – right? – and here’s why. ... If that’s the case, the Packers should win – and perhaps comfortably.”
  2. 2Laken Tomlinson to be 1st on the depth chart“Nonetheless, indications are Tomlinson would start at left guard and Zeitler seemed confident that he’d be ready to go at right guard.”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Green Bay Packers to beat Buccaneers1Game Outcome PicksPackers 17–141000+183
Laken Tomlinson to be 1st on the depth chart2Depth Chart Calls————
2 calls · 1 hit · 1 waiting1000

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 1 depth chart call and 1 game outcome pick — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

1 of 2 have settled so far, averaging 100 out of 100, against 0 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Of the 1 unsettled call enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Game Outcome PicksGreen Bay Packers

    Green Bay Packers to beat Buccaneers

    What happenedPackers 17–14Packers at Buccaneers
    100Hit · naive 0
    100this call0a naive guess100better than naive1.83difficulty+183skill

    Closing line (Oct 4): Packers by 3 · favorite pick, Packers 58%.

    How this was scored
    won:
    GB
    score:
    17-14
    skill:
    183
    they picked:
    GB
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    TB
    difficulty:
    1.83
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    15
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Depth Chart CallsLaken TomlinsonGreen Bay Packers

    Laken Tomlinson to be 1st on the depth chart

    VerdictWaiting

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

The game in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.