Loading…
Loading…
QB · Louisville
127 checkable claims from 68 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Lamar Jackson, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 75% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bullish than 66% of the room, across 4 articles · 85.0 accuracy on him (1 settled)
more bullish than 60% of the room, across 2 articles · 66.7 accuracy on him (1 settled)
more bearish than 95% of the room, across 4 articles · 57.5 accuracy on him (1 settled)
more bearish than 95% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
Page 4 of 4 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
“So I will go Lamar Allen Saquon one, two, three. What do you think? ... I agree.”
more bearish than 87% of the room, across 3 articles · 31.9 accuracy on him (3 settled)
“I wrote down Lamar Allen Saquon... So I will go Lamar Allen Saquon one, two, three.”
“Lamar Jackson, I think is the m v P.”
“I think it's Lamar Jackson's MVP. I think the numbers he put up right now are historic.”
“Ravens QB Lamar Jackson (1 vote: Mornhinweg)”
“Lamar Jackson BAL QB ... 139.7 851.9 4.2”
“Lamar Jackson ... 3,630.2”