Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Walt· Aug 7, 2026

In its running 2026 free-agent signing grades, the site projects roles for several newly signed players (Diggs and Doubs as No. 2 receivers, Jennings and Nailor as third receivers, Allgeier as Arizona's primary back, Willis as Miami's starter), tags Chris Rodriguez as a potential fantasy sleeper, expects the Raiders to draft Fernando Mendoza No. 1 overall and the Jets to take an edge rusher at No. 2, sees Bradley Chubb helping Buffalo advance deep into the playoffs, and doubts several signees will make the 53-man roster.

“He has regressed since then due to age. However, he can still be a decent No. 2 receiver for Jayden Daniels.”

published in writing · Walter Football · read the original →

14 checkable claims — 8 depth chart calls, 3 roster spot calls, 1 mock draft pick, 1 playoff pick and 1 team draft slot call — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 24 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

2 of 14 have settled so far, averaging 50 out of 100, against 75 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Of the 9 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands above the room on 1 and below it on 8.

Where this call stands in the room

Jalen Coker · 2026 season

8 calls from 8 pundits between 1 and 2. Walt said 2. the room's median is 2. not settled yet

Walt — 2the room — 8 calls from 8 punditsmedian 2

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

14 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these