G. Elliott Morris#1 of 21 election pundits · Nov 3, 2026
Morris's final forecast calls for Democrats to win the House and, less certainly, the Senate, with their model giving them roughly an 8-in-10 chance of majorities in both chambers.
Published in writing · Strength In Numbers (newsletter)Read the original
What G. Elliott Morris said
our reading, beside the words we read it fromAlmost every quantitative indicator suggests Democrats are going to win the House and are more likely than not — though a far way from certain — to win the Senate.
- Where it was published
- Strength In Numbers (newsletter)
- The piece
- FINAL forecast: a blue wave, or a blue tsunami?
- The original
- Read the original
- Read it wrong?
- Tell us and we will look
- SaidNov 3
- Election DayNov 3
- GradedNov 10
- 1Control of Congress“are more likely than not — though a far way from certain — to win the Senate ... my forecasting model gives Democrats a roughly 8-in-10 chance of winning majorities in both chambers”
- 2Control of Congress“Almost every quantitative indicator suggests Democrats are going to win the House ... my forecasting model gives Democrats a roughly 8-in-10 chance of winning majorities in both chambers”
Box score
HitCloseMissWaiting| Verdict | Call | Kind | What happened | Score | Naive | Skill |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “are more likely than not — though a far way from certain — to…”1 | Control of Congress | — | 100 | 0 | +100 | |
| “Almost every quantitative indicator suggests Democrats are…”2 | Control of Congress | — | 100 | 0 | +100 | |
| 2 calls · 2 hits · all settled | 100 | 0 | ||||
How each call scored
a naive guessbetter than naive2 checkable claims — 2 control of congress — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.
All 2 have settled, averaging 100 out of 100, against 0 for a naive guess at the same calls.
Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.
“are more likely than not — though a far way from certain — to win the Senate ... my forecasting model gives Democrats a roughly 8-in-10 chance of winning majorities in both chambers”
VerdictHit100Hit · naive 0100this call−0a naive guess=100better than naive×1difficulty=+100skillThink this is wrong?How this was scored
- right:
- yes
- election year:
- 2026
- skill:
- 100
- topic:
- elections
- in their words:
- more likely than not — though a far way from certain — to win the Senate
- result from:
- wikipedia-2026: Wikipedia's 2026 election results tables (race summary tables, which relay the Associated Press race calls), read 2026-11-07: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_Senate_elections , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_gubernatorial_elections . Facts only; CC BY-SA.
- chamber:
- 2026-senate
- who controls it:
- Democratic
- accuracy:
- 100
- baseline:
- 0
- they said:
- Democratic
- days before the vote when called:
- 0
- difficulty:
- 1
- the naive guess:
- the party in control going in keeps it
- Election Day:
- 2026-11-03
- the result is:
- called
- who controlled it before:
- Republican
“Almost every quantitative indicator suggests Democrats are going to win the House ... my forecasting model gives Democrats a roughly 8-in-10 chance of winning majorities in both chambers”
VerdictHit100Hit · naive 0100this call−0a naive guess=100better than naive×1difficulty=+100skillThink this is wrong?How this was scored
- right:
- yes
- election year:
- 2026
- skill:
- 100
- topic:
- elections
- in their words:
- a roughly 8-in-10 chance of winning majorities in both chambers
- result from:
- wikipedia-2026: Wikipedia's 2026 election results tables (race summary tables, which relay the Associated Press race calls), read 2026-11-07: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_Senate_elections , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_gubernatorial_elections . Facts only; CC BY-SA.
- chamber:
- 2026-house
- who controls it:
- Democratic
- accuracy:
- 100
- baseline:
- 0
- they said:
- Democratic
- days before the vote when called:
- 0
- difficulty:
- 1
- the naive guess:
- the party in control going in keeps it
- Election Day:
- 2026-11-03
- the result is:
- called
- who controlled it before:
- Republican
- All
The take as a whole
the average of 2 settled calls, each counted once
100naive 0
More control of congress
The same kind of call, about other players and teams.
Erick-Woods Erickson · Control of Congress · Hit 100
Erickson expects a bad night for Republicans: they lose the Senate seats in North Carolina and Texas but hold the rest of the contested seats — Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, South Carolina and Ohio — and keep Senate control, possibly even flipping Michigan. They believe the House is lost, with the GOP shedding roughly 25 seats.