Skip to main content
MissedTakes
Menu

Peter Bukowski· Apr 29, 2026

Peter expects rookie cornerback Brandon Cisse to end up as a starter for the Packers, believes kicker Trace Mack has the inside track to be Green Bay's kicker, thinks UDFA RJ Maryland makes the practice squad, and puts the Bears at nine wins in 2026 while ranking the NFC North Packers-Lions-Bears-Vikings.

“So that would put the bears at a nine win team next year.”

said on air, transcribed by us · Locked On Packers (podcast) · read the original →

5 checkable claims — 2 depth chart calls, 1 power ranking, 1 roster spot call and 1 season win total — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing bet.

It names 5 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

None of them have settled yet — they grade once their results are in.

Of the 3 unsettled calls enough other pundits have weighed in on, this one lands below the rest of the room on every one.

Where this call stands in the room

Chicago Bears · 2026 season · wins

20 calls from 16 pundits between 3 wins and 12 wins. Peter Bukowski said 9 wins. the room's median is 10 wins. not settled yet

Peter Bukowski — 9 winsthe room — 20 calls from 16 punditsmedian 10 wins

Every dot is a call somebody published on the same question. Where the dots land says where this take sits, not whether it is right — nothing here is settled yet. Hover a dot for the name and number; click it to read that take.

Where do you stand? Pick this and every open claim on Picks →

Who this take is about

5 checkable claims in this take

Each one is scored on its own against the published methodology. A pundit naming several outcomes is graded on each, not on all-or-nothing.

  • Power RankingsApr 29, 2026

    “Okay. Peter, your, your rankings of the NFC North after the draft? I unfortunately have the exact same four”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Trey Smack to be 1st on the depth chart

    “Did the Packers trade two picks for a kicker that they don't they don't see as someone who has a pathway to starting on their team? No. I think that's the he has the inside track until further notice.”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Brandon Cisse to be 1st on the depth chart

    “But I I do think that Benjamin St. Juice is probably gonna be one of those guys that ends up starting and then, you know, you go from there.”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • R.J. Maryland to make the roster

    “The RJ Maryland undrafted free agent is someone he's someone I think I think is gonna make this practice squad.”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

  • Chicago Bears to finish with 9 wins

    “So that would put the bears at a nine win team next year. Like, that That is what I'm talking about. And that doesn't seem crazy.”

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

    Think this is wrong?

What others said about the same people

More depth chart calls

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.

Discussed alongside these