Skip to main content

Chad Ochocinco Johnson#63 of 87 NFL pundits · Sep 25, 2025

Johnson predicted the Bengals would win two straight with Jake Browning at quarterback — beating the Broncos on Monday night and then beating the Lions in Cincinnati.

Said on air or in an interview · Nightcap (podcast)Hear the original

0 of 2calls landed2 misses · all settled
0Average accuracyout of 100, across 2 calls
50A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
2 of 2Settlednone still waiting
#63Chad Ochocinco Johnson’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Chad Ochocinco Johnson said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
We're gonna beat the Broncos Monday Night, and then I'm going to the game in Cincinnati against the Lions, and we're gonna beat the Lions.
Chad Ochocinco Johnson, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was said
Nightcap (podcast)
The episode
Nightcap Hour 2: STEELERS interested in TYREEK HILL?! + 49ers BRIAN ROBINSON JR. names his Top 5 ALABAMA RBs + AJ Brown BREAKS silence on Eagles’ STRUGGLES
The original
Hear the original

The page this came from has changed since we captured it on Aug 5, 2026. The quote and evidence here are from our capture, not from what the page says today.

  1. SaidSep 25, 2025
  2. GradedAug 5, 2026
  1. 1Cincinnati Bengals to beat Lions“and then I'm going to the game in Cincinnati against the Lions, and we're gonna beat the Lions.”
  2. 2Cincinnati Bengals to beat Broncos“I'm gonna tell you what God told me. Were going on a two game win streak. We're gonna beat the Broncos Monday Night”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Cincinnati Bengals to beat Lions1Game Outcome Picks—000
Cincinnati Bengals to beat Broncos2Game Outcome Picks—0100−183
2 calls · 2 misses · all settled050

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naiveworse than naive

2 checkable claims — 2 game outcome picks — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

All 2 have settled, averaging 0 out of 100, against 50 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Game Outcome PicksCincinnati Bengals

    Cincinnati Bengals to beat Lions

    VerdictMiss
    0Miss · naive 0
    0this call0a naive guess0better than naive1.83difficulty0skill
    How this was scored
    won:
    DET
    score:
    37-24
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    CIN
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    0
    the naive pick:
    CIN
    difficulty:
    1.83
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    15
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Game Outcome PicksCincinnati Bengals

    Cincinnati Bengals to beat Broncos

    VerdictMiss
    0Miss · naive 100
    0this call100a naive guess−100worse than naive1.83difficulty−183skill

    Closing line (Sep 29): Broncos by 7.5 · underdog pick, Bengals about 1 in 5 (21%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    DEN
    score:
    3-28
    skill:
    −183
    they picked:
    CIN
    season:
    2025
    accuracy:
    0
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    DEN
    difficulty:
    1.83
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    15
    Think this is wrong?
  3. All

    The take as a whole

    the average of 2 settled calls, each counted once

    0naive 50

Others on the same people

More game outcome picks

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.